Used to check for browser translation.
用于检测浏览器翻译。
ブラウザの翻訳を検出する

A Detailed Comparison of DID Spaces with Other Storage Solutions

Matt McKinney
2025年3月25日 · edited
B
Blogs
cover

Empowering Users with Decentralized Data Control#

The increasing centralization of digital data raises concerns about user privacy and control. ArcBlock's DID Spaces aims to address this by offering a decentralized storage solution built on web standards, ensuring interoperability. Utilizing Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) facilitates secure data sharing with user-defined access control.

image.png

Robert Mao, CEO of ArcBlock, described DID Spaces as a "trusted digital safe" for users' digital lives, featuring self-hosting, application data backup, and high data portability (ArcBlock, 2025, https://www.arcblock.io/blog/en/did-spaces-personal-data-freedom). This article compares DID Spaces to traditional cloud services and decentralized alternatives to highlight its unique position and capabilities.

Comparing DID Spaces to Traditional Cloud Storage: iCloud and Google One#

While sharing some functional similarities with services like Apple's iCloud and Google One, DID Spaces differs significantly in user control and privacy.



DID Spaces



iCloud



Google One

Data Ownership


Your data, completely under your control


Your data, but under Apple's control


Your data, but managed by Google


Data privacy


Your privacy is in your own hands


Depends on company policies

Depends on company policies

Are you able to use cloud services? (services hosted by others)

Yes


Yes


Yes


Can you self-host the service?

Yes


No


No


Network Drive Support


Yes (storage app)


Yes (iCloud Drive)


Yes (Google Drive)


Application Data Backup Support


Yes


(Any blocklets)

Yes


(through iCloud backup)

Yes


(Google, Android apps)

Application-Specific Data Support


Yes, any app that supports the DID Spaces protocol

Yes, enable iCloud Kit for apps


Yes, Google's applications include Gmail, Google Docs, etc.


Isolation among different apps

Yes


Yes


Yes


Data Sharing

Yes, controlled by DID

Yes, controlled by Apple accounts

Yes, controlled by Google accounts


Data Portability


Yes


n/a

n/a

Data backup

Yes


Through 3rd party apps

Through 3rd party apps

Pricing

Subscription-based.

Free when self-hosted.

Subscription-based

Subscription-based

Payment


Credit Card, Cryptocurrency Token


Credit Card


Credit Card


Pay-as-you-go support


Yes


No


No

include

Comparison Notes#

  • Data Ownership and Privacy: DID Spaces grants users full ownership and control over their data and privacy. iCloud and Google One manage data according to their respective policies. Apple encrypts data but may access metadata (Apple Privacy, 2023). Google also encrypts data but uses it for personalized ads unless users opt-out (Google Privacy Policy, 2023).
  • Self-Hosting and Ecosystem Flexibility: DID Spaces support self-hosting, unlike iCloud and Google One, reducing reliance on a single provider. It also supports network drives and application data backup for any app using its protocol. iCloud and Google One are tied to their ecosystems (iCloud Drive for Apple; Google Drive for Android/Google apps) (ArcBlock, 2025).
  • Data Sharing and Portability: DID Spaces enables controlled sharing via DIDs. While iCloud and Google One offer sharing within their ecosystems, data portability outside is limited. Exporting from Google One can be complex (Google Takeout, 2023). DID Spaces is designed for high data portability.
  • Pricing and Payment: DID Spaces offers subscription options, including a free self-hosted option, and accepts credit cards and cryptocurrency. iCloud and Google One are subscription-based, with credit card payments only (ArcBlock, 2023; Apple iCloud Pricing, 2023; Google One Pricing, 2023).
  • Isolation and App Support: All three isolate app data. DID Spaces supports any app using its protocol. iCloud uses iCloud Kit, and Google One supports its applications.
  • Blocklets: ArcBlock's application units allow application-specific data backup within DID Spaces.

DID Spaces vs. Decentralized and Self-Hosted Storage: MyData, IPFS/Filecoin, Arweave, CozyCloud, and NAS#

DID Spaces competes with decentralized and self-hosted solutions, offering a different balance of features and complexity.


Feature



Solid



DID Spaces



MyData


Storage

Personal Online Data Folders (Pods)


Your personal secure digital space


User-controlled storage (cloud, local, etc.)

Data Ownership


Full control within your Pods

You have full ownership of your data


Users control their data

Interoperability

Adheres to web standards


Easy sharing with DIDs

Aims for easy sharing

Identity

WebID (linked to your Pod)

Unique and secure digital identity (DID)


User-chosen identity options

Focus


Data ownership and sharing

One place for all your digital life (data, apps, ID)

Putting you in charge of your data

Data Portability


High; easy to move your data

Best: built for moving your data freely

Varies; depends on setup

Security

Good; utilizes access controls and encryption


Top-notch: blockchain-level security

Good; focus on user control

Use Cases


Personal data, social network, research


Everything: apps, data sharing, secure ID, and much more

Health data, education, personal data management

Comparison Notes#

  • Focus and Use Cases: DID Spaces is a secure space for personal data, ideal for sensitive information like health records or personal assets (ArcBlock, 2023). MyData focuses on user-controlled storage across cloud and local setups, aiming for easy sharing but with varying portability depending on the setup (MyData Principles, 2023, https://mydata.org/declaration/).


Feature


DID Spaces


IPFS/Filecoin

Arweave

CozyCloud


NAS


Focus


Your trusted digital safe

Share big files fast

Permanent data storage


Simple private cloud

Your hard drive at home

Strengths


Easy, private, super secure, future-proof

Fast, cheap, shareable

Forever, tamper-proof

Simple, confidential


Fast, lots of space, you're in control

Weaknesses


Newer tech best for personal data

Not for confidential information, potential data loss


Can be costly, and slower access

Limited free space, paid plans can be pricey

Needs hardware & setup, risk of data loss if it breaks

Good For

Storing personal info, assets safely

Sharing big files, public info

Archiving, long-term storage

Simple file storage & sharing

Backups, media, home network

Data location


Decentralized, you are in control


Global network


Permanent decentralized network


Cloud or self-hosted (your choice)

On your device


Access Method

Web, apps, and more to come

Special software or websites

Web browsers


Web or apps

Network connection

Cost

Free tier, cheap upgrades

Free use, pay for guaranteed storage

One-time payment based on size

Free tier, paid plans for more space

Upfront hardware cost, plus electricity

Technical Skill


None needed

Can be tricky, especially Filecoin

Easy for basic use, harder for complex tasks

Easy, self-hosting is technical

Needs some tech know-how

Comparison Notes#

  • Decentralized Solutions: IPFS (InterPlanetary File System) and Filecoin focus on fast file sharing, with Filecoin offering paid guaranteed storage. However, IPFS/Filecoin may not be ideal for highly confidential data (Filecoin Documentation, 2023). Arweave provides permanent storage with a one-time fee, suitable for archiving but potentially slower and costly for large amounts of data (Arweave Whitepaper, 2023). CozyCloud offers simple cloud or self-hosted storage with free and paid tiers; self-hosting requires technical skill (CozyCloud Documentation, 2023). NAS involves local hardware for storage (Synology NAS Guide, 2023).
  • Data Portability and Security: DID Spaces prioritizes data portability and security through user-controlled encryption. MyData's portability depends on the setup. IPFS/Filecoin and Arweave offer inherent portability due to their decentralized nature. CozyCloud's portability depends on hosting. Security in DID Spaces and MyData is user-centric, while IPFS/Filecoin and Arweave leverage blockchain principles. CozyCloud focuses on user control, and NAS security depends on user configuration.
  • Cost and Technical Skill: DID Spaces offers a free basic tier with affordable upgrades and requires minimal technical skill. IPFS is free, but Filecoin has storage costs and can be technically demanding. Arweave has a one-time cost and moderate technical requirements. CozyCloud has free and paid tiers, with self-hosting being technical. NAS involves hardware and some technical setup.

Why DID Spaces Is a Step Toward the Future of User-Controlled Data#

Traditional cloud services prioritize convenience but often at the expense of user control and privacy, subjecting users to corporate policies (Apple Privacy, 2023; Google Privacy Policy, 2023). Decentralized and self-hosted options offer alternatives but can introduce technical complexities, data loss risks, or high costs (Filecoin Documentation, 2023; Synology NAS Guide, 2023). DID Spaces aims to bridge this gap by providing a user-friendly, secure, decentralized solution. Leveraging Decentralized Identity (DID) and focusing on personal data storage empowers users with full ownership of their digital lives. Explore DID Spaces at https://www.didspaces.com.

Listen to the Podcast Overview#


你获得 0 积分